JAMIE DORNAN FULL FRONTAL IN VISIONAIRE 52

The frontier between porn and art is always very very thin. It's always interesting to see what's considered pornography and what's conceder art depending on the "packaging". If it comes with a Louis Vuitton set signed by Marc Jacobs it can't be porn right !!? Jamie Dornan was photographed Mert Alas & Marcus Piggott for the special limited edition book Visionaire 52 also featuring a full frontal image of Evandro Soldati. Thanx Freddie for the images. Click HERE or on the image above to discover the UNCUT version of Jamie Dornan. Is porno-chic back !? Maybe it never left ;-)

+ More Jamie Dornan on OhLaLa

Comments

[ERICK]

THIS IS REAL MAN I'D LOVE TO MARRY.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Keith]

Why do people often confuse a soft penis with porn?! I give props to this photo. We get are share with breast and ass in high art photography.So why not a nice looking penis?. People need to grow up and love their own bodies. And stop being embarrassed or shocked when the see a cock.

[michael]

It's a beautiful image, and I agree with Keith.

[Dr. Johnny]

don't like his beard !! kick him out of bed until he shaves !

[Gilreg]

Very nice miam miam miam

[Angel]

Nice Nice
I still stare at that part!!

[Trey C.]

That's either a really firm soft penis or some hung balls.

[Josh]

Very tasteful shot of a great male physique.

[Caroline]

I do not think there is anything wrong with seeing a penis. In movies, you see breasts all the time, so why not give us women a break from seeing the same thing we see if we look down.

Plus, he is VERY attractive.

[Ken B]

It's typical for women, like Caroline, to equate a woman's breast with a man's penis. I have seen many penises in current films, many erect, and some ejaculating semen. Yet I have seen but two clearly exposed images of a woman's genitals. You women are very sexist. Seeing a woman's breast and a man's penis are not equivalent. If ejaculating penises are ok, why don't we see more exposed vulvas?